From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Schmotzer

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Nov 7, 2013
No. 10-13-00204-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 10-13-00204-CR

11-07-2013

IN RE CHRISTOPHER KEITH SCHMOTZER


Original Proceeding


ORDER

We denied Christopher Keith Schmotzer's petition for writ of mandamus on October 10, 2013. He has now filed a "Motion for Suspension of the rules pursuant to T.R.A.P. Rule 2" and a "Motion for Rehearing Pursuant to T.R.A.P. 49.1." The "Motion for Suspension of the rules pursuant to T.R.A.P. Rule 2" did not contain a proper proof of service as required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5.

In a letter dated June 28, 2013, the Clerk of this Court informed Schmotzer that the trial court judge, who is the respondent, and the State, which is the real party in interest, are parties to this proceeding and must be served with copies of all documents presented to the Court. See id.; 52.2. The Clerk also warned Schmotzer in the same letter that, in the future, the failure to timely serve the trial court judge and the district attorney with a copy of each document filed with this Court and provide this Court with proof of service will result in the Court striking the document.

Schmotzer's motion for suspension of the rules did not contain proof of service at all. Accordingly, Schmotzer's "Motion for Suspension of the rules pursuant to T.R.A.P. Rule 2" is stricken.

Schmotzer's "Motion for Rehearing Pursuant to T.R.A.P. 49.1" is denied.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Motion stricken
Motion denied


Summaries of

In re Schmotzer

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Nov 7, 2013
No. 10-13-00204-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 7, 2013)
Case details for

In re Schmotzer

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CHRISTOPHER KEITH SCHMOTZER

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Nov 7, 2013

Citations

No. 10-13-00204-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 7, 2013)