From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re S.B

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 28, 2009
19 So. 3d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2D08-6148.

October 28, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tracy Sheehan, Judge.

David A. Dee, Tampa, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kelley R. Schaeffer, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


A.B. (the Father) challenges the trial court's order adjudicating his child, S.B., to be dependent as to him based on the imminent risk of prospective abuse or neglect. See § 39.01(15)(D, Fla. Stat. (2008). The Department of Children and Family Services properly concedes error based on the insufficiency of the evidence presented at trial to support an adjudication of dependency based on prospective abuse or neglect of the child. See R.V. v. Dep't of Children Family Servs., 939 So.2d 200 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); C.W. v. Dep't of Children Families, 10 So.3d 136 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Accordingly, we reverse the dependency order and remand this case to the circuit court to determine the current appropriateness of the placement of S.B. with the Father and for such other proceedings as may be appropriate.

S.B.'s mother also appealed the circuit court's order adjudicating the child dependent as to her; however, her appeal was dismissed for lack of prosecution.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

WALLACE, LaROSE, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

In re S.B

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 28, 2009
19 So. 3d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

In re S.B

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of S.B., a child. A.B., Appellant, v. Department of…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 28, 2009

Citations

19 So. 3d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)