From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sayadian

D.C. Court of Appeals
Jan 5, 2023
No. 22-BG-810 (D.C. Jan. 5, 2023)

Opinion

22-BG-810

01-05-2023

IN RE NEMA SAYADIAN, A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar Registration No. 991138


PER CURIAM

DDN: 2022-D106

BEFORE: Beckwith, Easterly, and Deahl, Associate Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order from the state of Maryland suspending respondent from the practice of law by consent for 60 days, stayed in favor of two years of probation with terms; this court's October 28, 2022, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; respondent's response stating that he does not oppose identical discipline; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel, it is

ORDERED that Nema Sayadian is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for 60 days, stayed in favor of two years of probation subject to compliance with all terms imposed by the state of Maryland. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that there is a rebuttable presumption in favor of imposition of identical discipline and exceptions to this presumption should be rare).

Summaries of

In re Sayadian

D.C. Court of Appeals
Jan 5, 2023
No. 22-BG-810 (D.C. Jan. 5, 2023)
Case details for

In re Sayadian

Case Details

Full title:IN RE NEMA SAYADIAN, A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court…

Court:D.C. Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 5, 2023

Citations

No. 22-BG-810 (D.C. Jan. 5, 2023)