From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sarah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. CAF 08-01830.

June 5, 2009.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Margaret O. Szczur, J.), entered August 19, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order denied the motion of respondent to vacate a default order terminating his parental rights.

DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

JOSEPH T. JARZEMBEK, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

DAVID C. SCHOPP, LAW GUARDIAN, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL), FOR SARAH A.

Present: Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order denying his second motion to vacate a default order terminating his parental rights with respect to his child based upon findings that he abandoned and permanently neglected her. On a prior appeal from the order denying the father's first motion to vacate the default order, we reversed the order, granted the motion, vacated the default order of fact-finding and disposition, and remitted the matter to Family Court for a hearing on the petition ( Matter of Sarah A, 60 AD3d 1293). Inasmuch as the father has already obtained the full relief he now seeks, the appeal is moot ( see generally T.D. v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 91 NY2d 860, 862).


Summaries of

In re Sarah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re Sarah

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SARAH A., an Infant. ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 5, 2009

Citations

63 A.D.3d 1592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 4522
879 N.Y.S.2d 762

Citing Cases

Leighann W. v. Thomas X.

Lastly, even assuming that hearsay claims of abuse may constitute “competent, material and relevant evidence”…