From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 2010
78 A.D.3d 1364 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 509556.

November 10, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Jose Santana, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Malone Jr., Stein and Garry, JJ.


While an authorized mail watch was in effect, petitioner, a prison inmate, was discovered to have sent letters to his sister containing gang information and which she was to forward to other incarcerated gang members. As a result, petitioner was served with a misbehavior report and, after a tier III disciplinary hearing, was found guilty of gang activity and violating facility correspondence procedures. That determination was administratively affirmed, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, testimony of the correction officer who examined petitioner's mail and authored the misbehavior report and copies of the letters provide substantial evidence to support the determination ( see Matter of Lozada v Fischer, 68 AD3d 1306, 1306, lv denied 14 NY3d 704; Matter of Lebron v Selsky, 53 AD3d 962, 962). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the authorized mail watch contained a sufficient basis, including specific facts, to satisfy the requirements of 7 NYCRR 720.3 (e) (1) ( see Matter of Lozada v Fischer, 68 AD3d at 1306; Matter of Deuiuo v Bezio, 63 AD3d 1489, 1490). We have examined petitioner's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 2010
78 A.D.3d 1364 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Santana

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSE SANTANA, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 10, 2010

Citations

78 A.D.3d 1364 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8046
910 N.Y.S.2d 386

Citing Cases

Ramos v. Annucci

Upon reviewing the document at issue, we agree. Accordingly, the determination of guilt must be aned (see…

Mena v. Fischer

Here, the Superintendent's authorization failed to set forth any facts upon which its issuance was based,…