From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sandlain

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 18, 2023
No. 23-1373 (4th Cir. May. 18, 2023)

Opinion

23-1373

05-18-2023

In re: BLAKE SANDLAIN, Petitioner.

Blake Sandlain, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: May 4, 2023

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. (1:22-cv-00222).

Blake Sandlain, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WYNN, THACKER, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Blake Sandlain petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket sheet reveals that on May 1, 2023, the magistrate judge issued proposed findings and a recommendation on Sandlain's petition. Because there has been recent significant action in Sandlain's case, we conclude there has been no undue delay. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Sandlain

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 18, 2023
No. 23-1373 (4th Cir. May. 18, 2023)
Case details for

In re Sandlain

Case Details

Full title:In re: BLAKE SANDLAIN, Petitioner.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 18, 2023

Citations

No. 23-1373 (4th Cir. May. 18, 2023)