From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sandlain

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 21, 2021
No. 21-1672 (4th Cir. Oct. 21, 2021)

Opinion

21-1672

10-21-2021

In re: BLAKE SANDLAIN, Petitioner.

Blake Sandlain, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: October 19, 2021

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:20-cv-00790)

Blake Sandlain, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Blake Sandlain filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and a supplemental petition for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for mandamus relief. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that on September 23, 2021, the district court denied Sandlain's motion for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Sandlain's case, we deny the mandamus petitions as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.


Summaries of

In re Sandlain

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 21, 2021
No. 21-1672 (4th Cir. Oct. 21, 2021)
Case details for

In re Sandlain

Case Details

Full title:In re: BLAKE SANDLAIN, Petitioner.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 21, 2021

Citations

No. 21-1672 (4th Cir. Oct. 21, 2021)