From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Samuels

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Oct 17, 1994
648 A.2d 943 (D.C. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-BG-103.

Submitted September 28, 1994.

Decided October 17, 1994.

Before FARRELL and KING, Associate Judges, and MACK, Senior Judge.


The Court of Appeals of Maryland placed respondent on voluntary inactive status provided that, before he is allowed to resume active status, he must demonstrate that he has been restored to good health and is capable of engaging in the competent practice of law. The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that this matter be treated as one warranting reciprocal discipline, and that the functionally identical discipline — indefinite voluntary suspension with reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness — may and should be imposed pursuant to D.C.Bar R.XI, § 13(e) (suspension upon claim of disability by attorney). Bar Counsel supports this recommendation, and respondent consents to the suspension. We accept the Board's recommendation.

Respondent agreed to be placed on inactive status in Maryland in light of disciplinary charges that were pending against him.

Accordingly, George J. Samuels is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia nunc pro tunc to May 6, 1993, provided that he files the affidavit required by D.C.Bar R.XI, § 14(f) within 30 days from the date of this opinion. Reinstatement shall be governed by the terms of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g) (attorney eligible for reinstatement after one year, upon showing "by the attorney, by clear and convincing evidence, that the disability has ended and that the attorney is fit to resume the practice of law"); see also D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16(b).

So ordered.


Summaries of

In re Samuels

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Oct 17, 1994
648 A.2d 943 (D.C. 1994)
Case details for

In re Samuels

Case Details

Full title:In re George J. SAMUELS, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 1994

Citations

648 A.2d 943 (D.C. 1994)

Citing Cases

In re Winkler

The Court has treated other cases in which respondents took inactive status in Maryland due to disability…

In re O'Brien

We treat such an action as one warranting reciprocal discipline and that the functionally identical…