From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Samaranayake

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 2, 2020
2020-1158 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 2, 2020)

Opinion

2020-1158

09-02-2020

IN RE: HARITHA SAMARANAYAKE, JERE PIKKARAINEN, ANN-MARIE MAATTA, SEPPO YLA-HERTTUALA, Appellants

J. MARK POHL, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellants. AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by MARY L. KELLY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/877,246.

JUDGMENT

J. MARK POHL, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellants. AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by MARY L. KELLY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, O'MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 2, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Samaranayake

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 2, 2020
2020-1158 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 2, 2020)
Case details for

In re Samaranayake

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: HARITHA SAMARANAYAKE, JERE PIKKARAINEN, ANN-MARIE MAATTA, SEPPO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 2, 2020

Citations

2020-1158 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 2, 2020)