From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sabin

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 6, 2020
2020-1055 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2020)

Opinion

2020-1055

10-06-2020

IN RE: ROBERT SABIN, Appellant

JOHN FRANCIS VODOPIA, John F. Vodopia, PC, Huntington, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ALFRED M. WALKER, Alfred M. Walker PC, Melville, NY. MAUREEN DONOVAN QUELER, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/661,964.

JUDGMENT

JOHN FRANCIS VODOPIA, John F. Vodopia, PC, Huntington, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ALFRED M. WALKER, Alfred M. Walker PC, Melville, NY. MAUREEN DONOVAN QUELER, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 6, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Sabin

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 6, 2020
2020-1055 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2020)
Case details for

In re Sabin

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: ROBERT SABIN, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 6, 2020

Citations

2020-1055 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2020)