From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ruth

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jun 29, 2022
No. 04-22-00058-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

04-22-00058-CV

06-29-2022

IN RE William Wesley RUTH, Relator


Original Proceeding

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 16375, styled Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. William Wesley Ruth, pending in the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa presiding.

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On January 28, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the respondent trial judge to vacate her December 27, 2021 orders granting the real party in interest's motion for partial summary judgment and denying relator's motions to dismiss, which relator complains were all rendered ex parte. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator did not show he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Ruth

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jun 29, 2022
No. 04-22-00058-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

In re Ruth

Case Details

Full title:IN RE William Wesley RUTH, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

No. 04-22-00058-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 29, 2022)