From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rute

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jul 20, 2021
No. 05-21-00590-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 20, 2021)

Opinion

05-21-00590-CV

07-20-2021

IN RE JONATHAN RUTE, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296-03470-2016

Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE

In his July 15, 2021 amended petition for writ of mandamus and request for emergency relief, relator contends that the trial court abused its discretion by (1) concluding that he waived his privileges and privacy rights regarding certain emails; and (2) ordering in camera review of those emails. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Based on our review of the petition and record, we conclude that relator has failed to show his entitlement to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus, and deny the request for emergency relief as moot.


Summaries of

In re Rute

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jul 20, 2021
No. 05-21-00590-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 20, 2021)
Case details for

In re Rute

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JONATHAN RUTE, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jul 20, 2021

Citations

No. 05-21-00590-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 20, 2021)