From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rush

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 2, 2016
225 N.J. 15 (N.J. 2016)

Opinion

06-02-2016

In the Matter of William J. RUSH, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 017732002).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15–164, concluding that WILLIAM J. RUSH of FAIRFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2002, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.15(a) (commingling funds and recordkeeping violations), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly notify clients or third parties of receipt of funds in which they have an interest and to promptly disburse those funds), RPC 1.15(d) (failure to comply with the recordkeeping requirements of Rule 1:21–6), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM J. RUSH is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Rush

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 2, 2016
225 N.J. 15 (N.J. 2016)
Case details for

In re Rush

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of William J. RUSH, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jun 2, 2016

Citations

225 N.J. 15 (N.J. 2016)
136 A.3d 938

Citing Cases

In re Smith

Therefore, the non-first-time homebuyer clients who received this version of the engagement letter were…

In re Woitkowski

Respondent also distinguished his conduct from the misconduct we found in In re Rush, 225 N.J. 15 (2016),…