Opinion
MDL Docket No. C 04-1648 MJJ, Individual Case No. C 06-5700 MJJ.
January 22, 2007
R. Scott Feldmann, Esq. (CA Bar No. 169230), Daniel A. Sasse, Esq. (CA Bar No. 236234), Van-Dzung V. Nguyen, Esq. (CA Bar No. 222832), CROWELL MORING LLP, Irvine, CA.
Kent A. Gardiner, Esq., Alexandre de Gramont, Esq., Rhonda M. Galaz, Esq. (CA Bar No. 228538), CROWELL MORING LLP, Washington, DC, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc., Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC, Bandag, Incorporated, and Pirelli Tire, LLC.
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR RESPONDING TO AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 AND * ORDER
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, counsel for Plaintiffs Bandag, Incorporated and Pirelli Tire, LLC (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant James J. Conway ("Defendant") submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' action, Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc., et al. v. Chemtura Corporation, et al., was transferred from the Middle District of Tennessee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407(c), and docketed with this Court on September 19, 2006;
WHEREAS, an amended complaint was filed on September 22, 2006;
WHEREAS, Defendant James J. Conway, by and through his attorney, was served with this action on December 19, 2006;
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to an extension of time for the filing of Defendant's answer or response;
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD, THAT: the time within which Defendant James J. Conway shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint dated September 22, 2006 is extended to January 30, 2007. The Parties further stipulate that this extension shall in no way waive or impair any right or defense that Defendant James J. Conway may assert in response to the Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED,