From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rothenberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 24, 2014
116 A.D.3d 1334 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-24

In the Matter of Michael L. ROTHENBERG, an Attorney. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Michael L. Rothenberg, Respondent.


Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael G. Gaynor of counsel), for petitioner.

Before: LAHTINEN, J.P., STEIN, GARRY and ROSE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2009. He was previously admitted in Georgia in 2002, where he maintained an office for the practice of law.

By order dated November 18, 2013, the Supreme Court of Georgia granted respondent's unopposed voluntary petition to resign from the Georgia bar based upon his conviction of wire fraud in violation of 18 USC § 1343, a federal felony. Respondent also admitted that, by his conviction, he violated the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. In accepting the voluntary surrender of respondent's license, the court specifically noted that this surrender was tantamount to disbarment and directed that respondent's name be removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in Georgia ( see generally Matter of Goodhart, 56 A.D.3d 889, 890, 866 N.Y.S.2d 454 [2008] ).

Petitioner now moves for an order imposing discipline pursuant to this Court's rules ( see22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has not replied or otherwise appeared in response to the motion.

We grant petitioner's motion and further conclude that, under the circumstances presented and in the interest of justice, respondent should be disbarred in this state.

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys ( see22 NYCRR 806.9). LAHTINEN, J.P., STEIN, GARRY and ROSE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Rothenberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 24, 2014
116 A.D.3d 1334 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

In re Rothenberg

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael L. ROTHENBERG, an Attorney. Committee on…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 24, 2014

Citations

116 A.D.3d 1334 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
116 A.D.3d 1334
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2845

Citing Cases

In re Vega

Moreover, respondent failed to notify this Court of his Texas resignation or his subsequent disbarment by the…

In re Calisi

Petitioner moves for an order imposing discipline pursuant to this Court's rules ( see22 NYCRR 806.19).…