From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ross

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jun 4, 2009
326 F. App'x 567 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2009-1011.

June 4, 2009.

On Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals Interferences, No. 09/901,512.

Phillip M. Pippenger, Leydig, Voit Mayer, Ltd., of Chicago, IL, argued for appellants.

Janet A. Gongola, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, VA, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With her on the brief were, Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor and William LaMarca, Associate Solicitor.

Before MAYER, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.


Judgment


This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

In re Ross

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jun 4, 2009
326 F. App'x 567 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
Case details for

In re Ross

Case Details

Full title:In re James E. ROSS and William J. Lynch

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 4, 2009

Citations

326 F. App'x 567 (Fed. Cir. 2009)