From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rosenbloom

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 2, 2018
183 A.3d 944 (N.J. 2018)

Opinion

D–15 September Term 2017 080078

05-02-2018

In the MATTER OF Andrew S. ROSENBLOOM, an Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 02152002)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB–17–122 that ANDREW S. ROSENBLOOM of PHOENIXVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2002, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client); and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation),

And the Court having determined in its review of the matter that an admonition is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent's unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANDREW S. ROSENBLOOM is hereby admonished; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Rosenbloom

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 2, 2018
183 A.3d 944 (N.J. 2018)
Case details for

In re Rosenbloom

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Andrew S. ROSENBLOOM, an Attorney At Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: May 2, 2018

Citations

183 A.3d 944 (N.J. 2018)
233 N.J. 202