From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rosen

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 13, 2019
2018-1944 (Fed. Cir. May. 13, 2019)

Opinion

2018-1944

05-13-2019

IN RE: ELIAS ROSEN, MATTHEW SABATINO, Appellants

MICHAEL JOHN TSIMARAS, Hoxie & Associates LLC, Milburn, NJ, argued for appellants. Also represented by MICHAEL STRAHER. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, ROBERT J. MCMANUS, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/382,977.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL JOHN TSIMARAS, Hoxie & Associates LLC, Milburn, NJ, argued for appellants. Also represented by MICHAEL STRAHER. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, ROBERT J. MCMANUS, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 13, 2019

Date

/s /Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Rosen

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 13, 2019
2018-1944 (Fed. Cir. May. 13, 2019)
Case details for

In re Rosen

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: ELIAS ROSEN, MATTHEW SABATINO, Appellants

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 13, 2019

Citations

2018-1944 (Fed. Cir. May. 13, 2019)