From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rose

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Feb 20, 2007
No. 14-07-00062-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2007)

Opinion

No. 14-07-00062-CV

Opinion filed February 20, 2007.

Original Proceeding. Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied.

Panel consists of Justices YATES, ANDERSON, and HUDSON.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On February 6, 2007, relators, David Rose and Dana Rose, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court, requesting we compel the Honorable Reece Rondon, presiding judge of the 234th District Court, Harris County, Texas, to vacate rulings on real party-in-interest's motion for partial summary judgment, relators' motion to continue real party's motion for partial summary judgment, and order respondent to hear the motion for partial summary judgment after the start of trial in the underlying case. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.

discretion for which they have no adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Ford Motor Co., 165 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. 2005). Accordingly, we deny relators' petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Rose

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Feb 20, 2007
No. 14-07-00062-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2007)
Case details for

In re Rose

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DAVID ROSE AND DANA ROSE, Relators

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Feb 20, 2007

Citations

No. 14-07-00062-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2007)