The Court has " ‘broad discretion to preserve the integrity and purpose of the pretrial order,’ which, toward the end of court efficiency, is to expedite pretrial procedure." In re Roqumore , No. 06-36406, 2010 WL 148189, at *2 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2010) (citing S & W Enterprises, L.L.C. v. SouthTrust Bank of Alabama, NA, 315 F.3d 533, 535 (5th Cir. 2003) (quoting Geiserman v. MacDonald , 893 F.2d 787, 790 (5th Cir.1990) ; Hodges v. United States , 597 F.2d 1014, 1018 (5th Cir.1979) ). Under the circumstances of this case, the Court is unwilling to exercise its discretion to extend the deadlines of the Scheduling Order.