From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Roover

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 2, 2017
155 A.D.3d 1184 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

11-02-2017

In the Matter of Melissa Ann ROOVER, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 4005005).

Melissa Ann Roover, Washington, D.C., pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Melissa Ann Roover, Washington, D.C., pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, DEVINE, AARONS and PRITZKER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Melissa Ann Roover was admitted to practice by this Court in 2001 and lists a business address in Washington, D.C. with the Office of Court Administration. Roover now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR § 1240.22 [a]] ). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney.

As is noted by AGC, Roover is presently delinquent in her New York attorney registration requirements, having failed to register for two consecutive biennial periods beginning in 2015 (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Rules of the Chief Admin. of Cts. [ 22 NYCRR § 118.1 ]). Inasmuch as Roover is therefore subject to potential disciplinary action (see Judiciary Law § 468–a [5 ]; Rules of Professional Conduct [ 22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 8.4[d]; see also Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 113 A.D.3d 1020, 1021, 979 N.Y.S.2d 548 [2014] ), she is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and her application must be denied (see Matter of Cluff, 148 A.D.3d 1346, 1346, 47 N.Y.S.3d 919 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ). Further, any future application by Roover must be supported by proof of her full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law § 468–a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts ( 22 NYCRR § 118.1 ) (see Matter of Frank, 146 A.D.3d 1228, 1228–1229, 46 N.Y.S.3d 434 [2017] ).

ORDERED that Melissa Ann Roover's application for permission to resign is denied.

McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, DEVINE, AARONS and PRITZKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Roover

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 2, 2017
155 A.D.3d 1184 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re Roover

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Melissa Ann ROOVER, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 2, 2017

Citations

155 A.D.3d 1184 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
155 A.D.3d 1184

Citing Cases

In re Hawkins

The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application…

In re Hawkins

The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application…