From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rommeney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 23, 2009
64 A.D.3d 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 506167.

July 23, 2009.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 12, 2008, which disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Danielle L. Rommeney, Deltona, Florida, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Kane, Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


Claimant worked at the front desk of a doctor's office for 2½ years. After she lost her rent stabilized apartment in Brooklyn, she was purportedly unable to find affordable housing in Staten Island near her place of employment. Consequently, she resigned from her position and moved to Florida to live with her mother. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. The record does not disclose that claimant undertook significant efforts to find a suitable apartment or that her relocation to Florida was necessitated by financial considerations. Although she testified that she could not find an affordable apartment in Staten Island near her workplace, she did not identify any other areas that she looked, and she admitted that she did not look in Brooklyn. In addition, she failed to provide evidence to substantiate her claim that she had to move to Florida due to her financial circumstances. In view of the foregoing, substantial evidence supports the Board's decision that claimant left her employment for personal and noncompelling reasons ( see Matter of Berkmann [Commissioner of Labor], 18 AD3d 943; Matter of Dampman [Sweeney], 246 AD2d 940, 941).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Rommeney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 23, 2009
64 A.D.3d 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re Rommeney

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of DANIELLE L. ROMMENEY, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 23, 2009

Citations

64 A.D.3d 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5933
884 N.Y.S.2d 274