From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 31, 2008
47 A.D.3d 1178 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 502836.

January 31, 2008.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 29, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Lisa R. Rogers, Johnson, appellant pro se.

MacVean, Lewis, Sherwin McDermott, P.C., Middletown (Kevin F. Preston of counsel), for Beena 1 Corporation, respondent.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Marjorie S. Leff of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ.


Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, which reversed a decision of an Administrative Law Judge and ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she lost her employment as a pharmacy manager due to misconduct. The employer testified that, on May 9, 2006, claimant left work 2½ hours early without permission, which was corroborated by another employee who was working that day and witnessed the incident. Although claimant testified to the contrary, maintaining that she did not feel well and was given permission to leave early, "it is within the exclusive province of the Board to resolve such credibility issues and draw inferences from the evidence presented, even if its conclusions are contrary to those reached by the Administrative Law Judge" ( Matter of Radu [Commissioner of Labor], 13 AD3d 701, 702; see Matter of Kretchmer [Commissioner of Labor], 8 AD3d 849, 850). Further, the Board's finding that claimant made a willful false statement to obtain benefits and its imposition of a recoverable overpayment are supported by claimant's response in applying for benefits that her employment was lost due to lack of work ( see Matter of Paquette [Commissioner of Labor], 45 AD3d 1087, 1088; Matter of Radu [Commissioner of Labor], 13 AD3d at 702).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 31, 2008
47 A.D.3d 1178 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Rogers

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of LISA R. ROGERS, Appellant. BEENA 1…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 31, 2008

Citations

47 A.D.3d 1178 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 595
849 N.Y.S.2d 459

Citing Cases

In re Pedigo

Here, the employer's comptroller testified that claimant abruptly left his job without consulting his…

In re Park

Following a complaint from a coworker concerning claimant's Internet use, the manager conducted an…