From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rodriguez-Lafrasse

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 6, 2015
592 F. App'x 946 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2014-1545

02-06-2015

IN RE CLAIRE RODRIGUEZ-LAFRASSE, ELIE HADCHITY

MARINA T. LARSON, Larson and Anderson, LLC, Dillon, CO, argued for appellants. JAMIE LYNNE SIMPSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, JEREMIAH HELM.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/528,118.

JUDGMENT

MARINA T. LARSON, Larson and Anderson, LLC, Dillon, CO, argued for appellants. JAMIE LYNNE SIMPSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, JEREMIAH HELM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and BRYSON, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 6, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Rodriguez-Lafrasse

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 6, 2015
592 F. App'x 946 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Case details for

In re Rodriguez-Lafrasse

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CLAIRE RODRIGUEZ-LAFRASSE, ELIE HADCHITY

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 6, 2015

Citations

592 F. App'x 946 (Fed. Cir. 2015)