From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rockenberger

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 14, 2017
2017-1035 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2017)

Opinion

2017-1035

11-14-2017

IN RE: JOERG ROCKENBERGER, MAO TAKASHIMA, FABIO ZURCHER, KEVIN HUBERT, KLAUS KUNZE, WENZHUO GUO, BRENT RIDLEY, Appellants

ANDREW DAVID FORTNEY, Central California IP Group, PC, Fresno, CA, argued for appellants. BRIAN RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT MCBRIDE.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 10/789,274.

JUDGMENT

ANDREW DAVID FORTNEY, Central California IP Group, PC, Fresno, CA, argued for appellants. BRIAN RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT MCBRIDE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (TARANTO, CLEVENGER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 14, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Rockenberger

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 14, 2017
2017-1035 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2017)
Case details for

In re Rockenberger

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: JOERG ROCKENBERGER, MAO TAKASHIMA, FABIO ZURCHER, KEVIN HUBERT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 14, 2017

Citations

2017-1035 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2017)