From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Robinson

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 9, 2012
464 F. App'x 878 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2011-1277 Serial No. 12/020,068

02-09-2012

IN RE CYNTHIA Y. ROBINSON, JEFFREY S. LOUTIT, and MICHELLE M. FREEMER

KEVIN M. FLOWERS, Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellants. On the brief were LL-HEIEN RLN LAURES and SHELLEY C. DANEK. SYDNEY O. JOHNSON, JR. Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief was RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor. Of counsel was BRIAN T. RACILLA, Associate Solicitor.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

KEVIN M. FLOWERS, Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellants. On the brief were LL-HEIEN RLN LAURES and SHELLEY C. DANEK.

SYDNEY O. JOHNSON, JR. Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief was RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor. Of counsel was BRIAN T. RACILLA, Associate Solicitor.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (BRYSON, DYK, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

______________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

In re Robinson

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 9, 2012
464 F. App'x 878 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

In re Robinson

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CYNTHIA Y. ROBINSON, JEFFREY S. LOUTIT, and MICHELLE M. FREEMER

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 9, 2012

Citations

464 F. App'x 878 (Fed. Cir. 2012)