From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Roberts

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Mar 8, 2000
18 S.W.3d 736 (Tex. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 04-00-00129-CV

Filed March 8, 2000

Appeal from the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1999-PA-00259 Honorable John J. Specia, Jr., Judge Presiding.

Tomas Ramirez, III, Law Office of Tomas Ramirez, III, Devine, George W. Baugh, San Antonio, for appellant.

Kristen L. Calvert, George Carroll, Susan D. Reed, Criminal Dist. Atty., San Antonio, for appellee.

Sitting: Alma L. LÓPEZ, Justice, Paul W. GREEN, Justice, Karen ANGELINI, Justice.



The court has considered the relator's petition for writ of mandamus and the relator's motion for emergency relief, and is of the opinion that relief should be denied because the trial court's ruling on a motion to show authority can be remedied by appeal. See State Board of Insurance v. Williams, 736 S.W.2d 259, 260 (Tex.App.-Austin 1987, no writ) (denying mandamus relief because error in ruling on motion to show authority could be remedied by appeal). Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus and request for temporary relief are denied. Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.


Summaries of

In re Roberts

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Mar 8, 2000
18 S.W.3d 736 (Tex. App. 2000)
Case details for

In re Roberts

Case Details

Full title:IN RE WILLIAM ROBERTS

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Mar 8, 2000

Citations

18 S.W.3d 736 (Tex. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

In re Trident Steel Corp.

A ruling on such a motion can be adequately remedied by appeal. In re Roberts, 18 S.W.3d 736 (Tex. App.—San…

Re International Marine, 13-10-00195-CV

The burden on relator includes the burden to show that other remedies, including ordinary appeal, are…