From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Robbins

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 5, 2016
139 A.D.3d 1177 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

Attorney Registration No. 4573697

05-05-2016

In the Matter of SEAN ROBBINS, a Suspended Attorney. COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, Petitioner; SEAN ROBBINS, Respondent.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner. Law Offices of Richard E. Grayson, White Plains (Richard E. Grayson of counsel), for respondent.


Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Law Offices of Richard E. Grayson, White Plains (Richard E. Grayson of counsel), for respondent.

Per Curiam

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Respondent was admitted to practice in Massachusetts in 2001 and in New York by this Court in 2008. Respondent currently resides in the City of White Plains, Westchester County.

By decision entered April 9, 2009, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of nine months based upon his prior nine-month suspension by the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County, Massachusetts (61 AD3d 1177 [2009]). Respondent has since been reinstated to the practice of law in Massachusetts. Respondent now applies for reinstatement in New York. While petitioner initially opposed the application, we note that this Court's Committee on Character and Fitness has submitted a favorable report (see Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.12 [b]).

Our examination of the papers submitted on the application indicates that respondent has made all proper disclosures and has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with this Court's rules regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.9). We are also satisfied that respondent has complied with the requirements of this Court's rules regarding reinstatement (see Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.12 [b]), and that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law in this state.

Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Egan Jr., J.P., Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

In re Robbins

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 5, 2016
139 A.D.3d 1177 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Robbins

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SEAN ROBBINS, a Suspended Attorney. COMMITTEE ON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 5, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 1177 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3580
29 N.Y.S.3d 202