Opinion
2021-1123
09-07-2021
JAMES R. KLAIBER, Hughes Hubbard &Reed LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellants Richard Allen Robbins, Justin Mark Brockie, James Michael Kelly, Asif Ali, Mo-jahedul Hoque Abul Hasanat, Omar Faruq, Sazzad Rafique, Tahseen Mohammad, Ummy Habiba, Suraiya Parveen, Jeremy Ian Schulman Robbins. Also represented by JAMES W. DABNEY, LYNN M. RUSSO, JUSTIN TAYLOR. DANIEL KAZHDAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrew Hirshfeld. Also represented by SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.
This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/675, 440.
JAMES R. KLAIBER, Hughes Hubbard &Reed LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellants Richard Allen Robbins, Justin Mark Brockie, James Michael Kelly, Asif Ali, Mo-jahedul Hoque Abul Hasanat, Omar Faruq, Sazzad Rafique, Tahseen Mohammad, Ummy Habiba, Suraiya Parveen, Jeremy Ian Schulman Robbins. Also represented by JAMES W. DABNEY, LYNN M. RUSSO, JUSTIN TAYLOR.
DANIEL KAZHDAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrew Hirshfeld. Also represented by SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.
JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM
PROST, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.