From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rivers

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 8, 2013
509 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-2222

02-08-2013

In re: CORNELIUS DEON RIVERS, a/k/a Neil, Petitioner.

Cornelius Deon Rivers, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(4:08-cr-01072-RBH-2)

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cornelius Deon Rivers, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Cornelius Deon Rivers petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his sealed motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court entered an order denying Rivers' sealed motion on October 1, 2012. Accordingly, because the district court has ruled on Rivers' motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Rivers

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 8, 2013
509 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

In re Rivers

Case Details

Full title:In re: CORNELIUS DEON RIVERS, a/k/a Neil, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 8, 2013

Citations

509 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2013)