From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ritchie

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
May 31, 2011
No. 05-11-00544-CV (Tex. App. May. 31, 2011)

Opinion

No. 05-11-00544-CV

Opinion Filed May 31, 2011.

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 06-06944.

Before Justices BRIDGES, FITZGERALD, and MURPHY.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relators contend the trial judge erred in denying their motion to release supersedeas bond and cash deposits. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Ritchie

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
May 31, 2011
No. 05-11-00544-CV (Tex. App. May. 31, 2011)
Case details for

In re Ritchie

Case Details

Full title:IN RE LEE C. RITCHIE, AS DIRECTOR OF RUPE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND AS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: May 31, 2011

Citations

No. 05-11-00544-CV (Tex. App. May. 31, 2011)