From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Application of Rissman

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Nov 29, 1927
87 Cal.App. 176 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)

Opinion

Docket No. 1575.

November 29, 1927.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to secure release from custody after conviction in the Municipal Court. Writ denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

William M. Morse, Jr., for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.


[1] The complaint in the municipal court contained at least an attempt to charge defendant therein with commission of the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses, a misdemeanor. Where this is so, and the jurisdiction challenged is that of a court of record, the failure to state all of the facts necessary to constitute such crime does not entitle the defendant to discharge by means of the writ of habeas corpus. ( Ex parte Ruef, 150 Cal. 665 [ 89 P. 605].) The writ is available for that purpose in an inferior court. ( In re Hernandez, 64 Cal.App. 71 [ 220 P. 423].)

But the constitution, in providing for municipal courts, has made them courts of record, and has plainly distinguished them from "inferior courts." (Const., art. VI, secs. 1 and 12.)

Assuming, without deciding, that the complaint against defendant, in the count on which he was convicted, is defective in the particulars stated by him in his petition herein, and that thereby the facts stated in said count are not sufficient to constitute the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses, this does not entitle him to the writ. He must be content with the ordinary remedies, including his right of appeal.

The petition is denied.

Houser, J., and York, J., concurred.


Summaries of

In re Application of Rissman

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Nov 29, 1927
87 Cal.App. 176 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)
Case details for

In re Application of Rissman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of DANIEL RISSMAN for a Writ of Habeas…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Nov 29, 1927

Citations

87 Cal.App. 176 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)
261 P. 727

Citing Cases

Los Angeles County Employees Assn. v. Superior Court

By that, the Court of Appeal meant that municipal courts are "courts of record" and are not "inferior"…

In re Tom Wong

As this proceeding is an attack on the judgment of a municipal court, the rule in those cases is applicable.…