From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rinaldo

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 15, 2015
123 A.3d 727 (N.J. 2015)

Opinion

10-15-2015

In the Matter of Richard P. RINALDO, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 006462003).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14–371, concluding that RICHARD P. RINALDO of UNION TOWNSHIP, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2003, should be suspended from practice for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 1.16(b) (improper termination of representation);

And RICHARD P. RINALDO having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent's unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD P. RINALDO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Rinaldo

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 15, 2015
123 A.3d 727 (N.J. 2015)
Case details for

In re Rinaldo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Richard P. RINALDO, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Oct 15, 2015

Citations

123 A.3d 727 (N.J. 2015)
223 N.J. 287

Citing Cases

In re Saluti

ismissal with prejudice for lack of prosecution; for the next five or six years, the attorney failed to…