From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Synopsys, Inc. v. Ricoh Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Apr 22, 2011
412 F. App'x 297 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-1415.

March 8, 2011. Rehearing Denied April 22, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 03-CV-2289, James Ware, Judge.

Carter G. Phillips, Sidley Austin, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee and defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for plaintiff-appellee were Richard D. Klingler and Rachel H. Town-send. Also on the brief were Ron E. Shulman, Terrence J.P. Kearney and Richard G. Frenkel, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich Rosati, of Palo Alto, CA for plaintiff-appellee and defendants-appellees.

Gary M. Hoffman, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant and plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Kenneth W. Brothers and Eric Oliver.

Before BRYSON, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.


JUDGMENT


THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Synopsys, Inc. v. Ricoh Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Apr 22, 2011
412 F. App'x 297 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Synopsys, Inc. v. Ricoh Co.

Case Details

Full title:In re RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT LITIGATION. Synopsys, Inc.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 22, 2011

Citations

412 F. App'x 297 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Ricoh Company, Ltd. Patent Litigation, 2011-1199

We affirmed without opinion. In re Ricoh Co., Ltd. Patent Litig., 412 Fed.Appx. 297, 298 (Fed.Cir.2011).…