From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re RH White Oak, LLC

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Nov 4, 2013
NO. 14-13-00979-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 4, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 14-13-00979-CV

11-04-2013

IN RE RH WHITE OAK, LLC, BRIAN HARDY, COLIN ZAK, ENTEX PARTNERS, LTD., AND ENTEX MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, Relators


Motion Granted and Order filed November 4, 2013.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

125th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-81470


ORDER

On October 31, 2013, relators, RH White Oak, LLC, Brian Hardy, Colin Zak, Entex Partners, Ltd., and Entex Management Services, LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221. Relators ask this court to order the Honorable Kyle Carter, Judge of the 125th District Court, in Harris County, Texas, to set aside his order dated October 25, 2013 granting sanctions for discovery abuse, entered in trial court cause number 2010-81470, styled Lone Star Bank v. RH White Oak, LLC, et al. Relators claim respondent abused his discretion by imposing sanctions against them.

Relators have also filed a motion for a temporary stay of proceedings below. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On October 31, 2013, relators asked this court to stay proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relators' request for relief requires further consideration and that relators will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relators' motion and issue the following order:

We ORDER the commencement of trial on November 5, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., and the enforcement of the October 25, 2013 order granting sanctions for discovery abuse in trial court cause number 2010-81470, styled Lone Star Bank v. RH White Oak, LLC, et al., STAYED until a final decision by this court on relators' petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.

In addition, the court requests the real parties in interest, to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before November 19, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Wise.


Summaries of

In re RH White Oak, LLC

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Nov 4, 2013
NO. 14-13-00979-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 4, 2013)
Case details for

In re RH White Oak, LLC

Case Details

Full title:IN RE RH WHITE OAK, LLC, BRIAN HARDY, COLIN ZAK, ENTEX PARTNERS, LTD., AND…

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 4, 2013

Citations

NO. 14-13-00979-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 4, 2013)