Opinion
No. 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK).
September 7, 2004
Charles Barrett, Esq., Attorney of Record for Plaintiffs.
Chris J. Walker, Esq., Peter J. Markow, Jr., Esq., R. Niles Hooper, Esq., Attorneys for Defendant.
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard upon the ore tenus motion of the Plaintiffs, who move this Court to dismiss with prejudice the claims against the Defendant, James N. Sikes, M.D. and the entry of a final judgment as to said Defendant. The Court, having considered the motion, noting the agreement of counsel for Plaintiffs and said Defendant, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Complaint and all claims filed therein by the Plaintiffs against the Defendant, James N. Sikes, M.D. shall be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all other claims of the Plaintiffs against the other Defendants named in this civil action are hereby reserved as stated in the Complaint and will proceed accordingly.
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.