Opinion
01-23-00519-CV
10-05-2023
In re Olivia Reyner
County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County No. 1189049
ORDER
AMPARO GUERRA, JUDGE
On July 19, 2023, relator, Olivia Reyner, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion "by issuing constitutionally insufficient notice of proceedings to the parties in the underlying case, while simultaneously intending to unfairly dismiss the underlying case for want of prosecution," by "failing to comply with mandatory and non-discretionary provisions of" Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 21(b), and by "failing to timely rule on multiple properly filed pre-trial [m]otions that [were] pending before" the trial court."
On August 8, 2023, the Court denied relator's petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. On September 26, 2023, relator filed a "Motion for Leave to File Amended or Supplemental Petition for Writ of Mandamus." In her motion, relator contends that since filing her petition for writ of mandamus, she "became aware that the underlying case, which is an appeal from the justice court to [the] county court, . . . has not been perfected" in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, relator argues, "[j]urisdiction has not properly attached to the county court."
Relator further states that since she filed her petition for writ of mandamus, she "has properly filed additional pre-trial [m]otions and [r]equests, that have been presented to the trial court for a ruling, but the trial court has failed to rule."
Relator therefore requests that she be permitted "to file an [a]mended or [s]upplemental [p]etition for writ of mandamus[] and leave to supplement the mandamus record." As noted above, relator's petition for writ of mandamus was denied by the Court on August 8, 2023. Accordingly, relator's "Motion for Leave to File Amended or Supplemental Petition for Writ of Mandamus" is denied as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(a).
It is so ORDERED.