From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rennert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 15, 2007
45 A.D.3d 1098 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 502478.

November 15, 2007.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance appeal Board, filed July 25, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Harlan Rennert, Massapequa Park, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Marjorie S. Leff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


Claimant was terminated from his position as a service merchandiser for violating the employer's policy governing the disposal of outdated goods. Under this policy, dairy products that were nearing expiration were to be credited by the merchandise receiver at the store where they were sold prior to being removed and were then to be either destroyed or returned to the distributor. Claimant attempted to remove eight cases of nearly expired yogurt from a store, purportedly to donate it to a food bank, without following this procedure. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified him from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he was terminated for misconduct. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. "An employee's failure to follow an employer's reasonable policy which, in turn, has a detrimental effect upon the employer's interest has been found to constitute disqualifying misconduct" ( Matter of Limoncelli [Commissioner of Labor], 32 AD3d 1066, 1067 [citations omitted]). Here, claimant violated a policy that provided the employer with both a means of financially accounting for outdated food products and of ensuring the safety of consumers. Inasmuch as this adversely affected the employer's interest, substantial evidence supports the finding of misconduct. Therefore, we decline to disturb the Board's decision.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Rennert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 15, 2007
45 A.D.3d 1098 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

In re Rennert

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of HARLAN RENNERT, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 15, 2007

Citations

45 A.D.3d 1098 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 8823
846 N.Y.S.2d 404

Citing Cases

In re Roberta Whitfield

Following administrative proceedings, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was…

In re Claim of Strang

Claimant's contention to the contrary presented a credibility determination for the Board to resolve ( see…