From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Reichstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 3, 2002
799 A.2d 1290 (N.J. 2002)

Opinion

June 3, 2002


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-261, concluding that RONALD REICHSTEIN of WEST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1959, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.4(b) (making false and misleading statements and counseling a client to testify falsely) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation);

And the conclusion of the Disciplinary Review Board that a reprimand is sufficient discipline for respondent's submission of proof that he has retired from the practice of law, and respondent having certified that he is retired; And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RONALD REICHSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that RONALD REICHSTEIN, having represented that he is retired completely from the practice of law, shall not engage in the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Reichstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 3, 2002
799 A.2d 1290 (N.J. 2002)
Case details for

In re Reichstein

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF RONALD REICHSTEIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 3, 2002

Citations

799 A.2d 1290 (N.J. 2002)
172 N.J. 647