From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Regules

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 9, 2009
NO. CIV. S-08-985 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2009)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-08-985 LKK/GGH.

March 9, 2009


ORDER


Defendants Miguel Regules and Martha Elvia Regules, proceeding without counsel, have filed a timely request for an extension of time for filing objections and corrections to the pretrial order. The court GRANTS this request.

Accordingly, the corrections and notice of exhibits filed on March 3, 2009 (dated February 26, 2009) will be accepted as timely. Plaintiff is granted five days from the date of this order to respond to defendants' objections.

As a separate matter, defendants filed two copies of their objections and exhibit list. These are identical, except for item 21 on the list of exhibits. On one copy, item 21 reads "Depositions from Debtors, Miguel V. Regules and Martha Elvia Regules Chistopher and Dana Regules." The second copy omits "Christopher and Dana Regules." Both versions therefore purport to introduce depositions of defendants themselves. Defendants are not permitted to introduce their own depositions. Defendants are INSTRUCTED to clarify for the court and plaintiff whether they wish to introduce the depositions of Christopher and Dana Regules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Regules

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 9, 2009
NO. CIV. S-08-985 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2009)
Case details for

In re Regules

Case Details

Full title:In Re CHRISTOPHER REGULES and DANA HOPE REGULES, Debtors. PREM DHAWAN…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 9, 2009

Citations

NO. CIV. S-08-985 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2009)