From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Regojo

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jul 26, 2004
180 N.J. 523 (N.J. 2004)

Opinion

July 26, 2004.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-457, concluding that FERNANDO REGOJO of UNION CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3(lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 1.8(h) (negotiating a malpractice settlement with a client without advising the client to seek independent counsel), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FERNANDO REGOJO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Regojo

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jul 26, 2004
180 N.J. 523 (N.J. 2004)
Case details for

In re Regojo

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF FERNANDO REGOJO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jul 26, 2004

Citations

180 N.J. 523 (N.J. 2004)
853 A.2d 231

Citing Cases

In re Regojo

On July 22, 2004, respondent received a second reprimand for gross neglect, lack of diligence, failure to…

In re Huff

Cases involving violations of RPC 1.8(h) are exceedingly rare. In In re Regojo, 180 N.J. 523 (2004), the…