Summary
centralizing three EFTA actions on the grounds that the actions shared factual questions regarding whether the defendant bank failed to disclose properly that fees would be charged to certain users of the bank's ATMs, and that discovery and briefing on dispositive motions would be largely duplicative among the actions
Summary of this case from In re Wal–mart Atm Fee Notice Litig..Opinion
MDL No. 2202.
2011-02-3
IN RE: REGIONS BANK ATM FEE NOTICE LITIGATION.
Before JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, DAVID R. HANSEN, W. ROYAL FURGESON, JR., FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., BARBARA S. JONES and PAUL J. BARBADORO, Judges of the Panel.
TRANSFER ORDER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the Panel:
SCHEDULE A
MDL No. 2202 — IN RE: REGIONS BANK ATM FEE NOTICE LITIGATION
Northern District of Mississippi
Jason Reeves v. Regions Bank, C.A. No. 2:10–00142 Southern District of Mississippi
Debra Miller v. Regions Bank, C.A. No. 5:10–00140 Western District of Tennessee
Suzette Hogan, et al. v. Regions Bank, C.A. No. 2:10–02607.
FN* Judge Kathryn H. Vratil took no part in the decision of this matter.