From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Redmill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 24, 2012
Docket Number: 2:10CR00299-11 (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Docket Number: 2:10CR00299-11

07-24-2012

RE: James Howard REDMILL


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Honorable Edward J. Garcia
Senior United States District Judge
Sacramento, California

CONTINUANCE OF JUDGMENT

AND SENTENCING: ORDER

Your Honor:

Per agreement with both counsel, it is respectfully requested that the above-referenced case be continued from August 24, 2012 to October 5, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. (See attached amended Schedule for Disclosure.)

REASON FOR CONTINUANCE: The PSR interview has been completed. Due to the complexity of the case and conflicting schedules amongst the parties, the following proposed schedule is offered.

By copy of this memorandum, the Court Clerk is being requested to make appropriate changes in the Court calendar.

Respectfully submitted,

LYNDA M. MOORE

United States Probation Officer

REVIEWED BY: _________________

JEFFREY C. OESTREICHER

Supervising United States Probation Officer

Dated: July 23, 2012

Sacramento, California

LMM/tau
Attachment

cc: Clerk, United States District Court

United States Attorney's Office

United States Marshal's Office

Federal Defender (If defense counsel is court-appointed)

Probation Office Calendar clerk

Approved

______ Disapproved

_________________

EDWARD J. GARCIA

Senior United States District Judge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff,

v.

James Howard REDMILL Defendant.

Docket Number: 2:10CR00299-11


SCHEDULE FOR DISCLOSURE OF

PRESENTENCE REPORT AND FOR

FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO THE

PRESENTENCE REPORT

The Probation Officer and all parties shall adhere to this schedule unless it is later modified by this Court:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦10/05/2012 ¦ ¦Judgment and Sentencing Date: ¦at 10:00 ¦ ¦ ¦a.m. ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------+------------¦ ¦Reply, or Statement of Non-Opposition: ¦09/28/2012 ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------+------------¦ ¦Motion for Correction of the Presentence Report shall be filed ¦ ¦ ¦with the Court and served on the Probation Officer and opposing ¦09/21/2012 ¦ ¦counsel no later than: ¦ ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------+------------¦ ¦The Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court and ¦09/14/2012 ¦ ¦disclosed to counsel no later than: ¦ ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------+------------¦ ¦Counsel's written objections to the Presentence Report shall be ¦ ¦ ¦delivered to the Probation Officer and opposing counsel no later¦09/07/2012 ¦ ¦than: ¦ ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------+------------¦ ¦The proposed Presentence Report shall be disclosed to counsel no¦08/24/2012 ¦ ¦later than: ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+


Summaries of

In re Redmill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 24, 2012
Docket Number: 2:10CR00299-11 (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)
Case details for

In re Redmill

Case Details

Full title:RE: James Howard REDMILL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 24, 2012

Citations

Docket Number: 2:10CR00299-11 (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)