From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ray v. Board of Elections of Dutchess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 24, 2000
275 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued August 22, 2000

August 24, 2000.

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-106 to set aside the results of a general election held on November 2, 1999, for the public office of Dutchess County Legislator for the 18th Legislative District, the appeal is from a final order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated January 26, 2000, which, inter alia, in effect, denied the petition.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal must be dismissed as academic (see, Matter of Hanington v. Coveney, 62 N.Y.2d 640). In any event, we reject the petitioner's contentions that the results of the original canvas should be considered the final results of the election, or that the Supreme Court should have directed a new election. The Supreme Court was empowered to order a recanvass (see, Election Law § 16-106), and at the recanvass, the petitioner was afforded the opportunity to review the ballots, challenge them for defects, and raise any objections to the tabulation of the ballots (see, Matter of Cregg v. Fisselbrand, 22 A.D.2d 342).


Summaries of

In re Ray v. Board of Elections of Dutchess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 24, 2000
275 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

In re Ray v. Board of Elections of Dutchess

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF RONALD S. RAY, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 24, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 126