Opinion
21-1313
07-22-2021
In re: MICHAEL RANKINS, Petitioner.
Michael Rankins, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: July 20, 2021
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:14-cr-00003-FL-1; 2:20-cv-00017-FL)
Michael Rankins, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit..
PER CURIAM.
Michael Rankins petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED