From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Randolph

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 22, 2016
642 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-1935

03-22-2016

In Re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH, Appellant.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:15-mc-00369) Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court's order issuing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion issuing the injunction. Cromer v. Kraft Foods N. Am., Inc., 390 F.3d 812, 817 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we grant Randolph's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

In re Randolph

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 22, 2016
642 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

In re Randolph

Case Details

Full title:In Re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH, Appellant.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 22, 2016

Citations

642 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2016)

Citing Cases

Wolfe v. Fairfax Cnty.

; In re Randolph, 642 Fed.Appx. 204 (4th Cir. 2016) (unpublished) (same); In re Williams, 2022 WL…

Joyner v. Prince William Cnty. Circuit Court

(1) the party's history of litigation, in particular whether he has filed vexatious, harassing, or…