From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Randall

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 2, 2015
132 A.D.3d 177 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-09-2

In the Matter of Percy A. RANDALL, Jr., a suspended attorney. Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, petitioner; Percy A. Randall, Jr., respondent.



Diana Maxfield Kearse, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Mark F. DeWan of counsel), for petitioner.

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J., REINALDO E. RIVERA, MARK C. DILLON, RUTH C. BALKIN, and THOMAS A. DICKERSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On January 22, 2015, the respondent pleaded guilty before the Honorable Barry Kron, in the Supreme Court, Queens County, to grand larceny in the second degree, in violation of Penal Law § 155.40(1), a class C felony. On January 22, 2015, the respondent was sentenced to a conditional discharge of three years and directed to pay restitution in the sum of $206,440.

The Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts now moves to strike the respondent's name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b) based upon his felony conviction.The respondent has neither opposed the Grievance Committee's motion nor submitted any papers in response.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(a), the respondent was automatically disbarred and ceased to be an attorney upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the motion to strike the respondent's name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law is granted, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b), to reflect the respondent's automatic disbarment as of January 22, 2015.

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(a), the respondent, Percy A. Randall, Jr., is disbarred, effective January 22, 2015, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b); and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent, Percy A. Randall, Jr., shall comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys ( see22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Percy A. Randall, Jr., is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,

ORDERED that if the respondent, Percy A. Randall, Jr., has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10(f).


Summaries of

In re Randall

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 2, 2015
132 A.D.3d 177 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

In re Randall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Percy A. RANDALL, Jr., a suspended attorney. Grievance…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 2, 2015

Citations

132 A.D.3d 177 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
132 A.D.3d 177
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 6728