From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ramos

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 6, 2021
NO. 03-21-00297-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 6, 2021)

Opinion

03-21-00297-CV

07-06-2021

In re Armando Ramos


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS J. BAKER, JUSTICE.

Relator Armando Ramos, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Relator requests that this Court compel the district clerk to file a separate writ of mandamus with the district court.

We have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(a); In re Thomas, No. 03-14-00099-CV, 2014 WL 904630, at *1 (Tex. App.-Austin Mar. 5, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Ramos has failed to provide an adequate record of his filings with the district court or otherwise demonstrate that issuing mandamus against the district clerk is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(a); In re Thomas, 2014 WL 904630, at *1.

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

In re Ramos

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 6, 2021
NO. 03-21-00297-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 6, 2021)
Case details for

In re Ramos

Case Details

Full title:In re Armando Ramos

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jul 6, 2021

Citations

NO. 03-21-00297-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 6, 2021)

Citing Cases

In re Smith

See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(a); In re Ramos, No. 03-21-00297-CV, 2021 WL 2793468, at *1 (Tex. …