From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig.

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Mar 26, 2024
07-0489 (PLF) (D.D.C. Mar. 26, 2024)

Opinion

07-0489 (PLF) MDL 1869

03-26-2024

In re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION This document relates to: ALL DIRECT PURCHASER CASES


ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In anticipation of the above-captioned matter soon being transferred to Judge Beryl Howell, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant BNSF Railway Company's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 1030], Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 1031], Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 1032], and Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 1033] are denied without prejudice to their being refiled before Judge Howell.

The individual cases that make up MDL Docket No. 1869 are Strates Shows, Inc. v. Association of American Railroads, Civil Action No. 07-1127; Donnelly Commodities, Inc. v. Association of American Railroads, Civil Action No. 07- 1515; Dust Pro, Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc., Civil Action No. 07-2061; Zinifex Taylor Chemicals, Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc., Civil Action No. 07-2062; and U.S. Magnesium LLC v. CSX Transportation, Inc., Civil Action No. 07-2116.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig.

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Mar 26, 2024
07-0489 (PLF) (D.D.C. Mar. 26, 2024)
Case details for

In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION This document…

Court:United States District Court, District of Columbia

Date published: Mar 26, 2024

Citations

07-0489 (PLF) (D.D.C. Mar. 26, 2024)