From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rafferty

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Apr 4, 2011
No. 05-11-00358-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. 05-11-00358-CV

Opinion issued April 4, 2011.

Original Proceeding from the 330th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 09-12373.

Before Justices MORRIS, FRANCIS, and MYERS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator contends the trial judge erred in refusing to set several motions for hearing. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has an adequate remedy on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Rafferty

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Apr 4, 2011
No. 05-11-00358-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 4, 2011)
Case details for

In re Rafferty

Case Details

Full title:IN RE RICHARD RAFFERTY, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Apr 4, 2011

Citations

No. 05-11-00358-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 4, 2011)